Tool & Function Calling

Tool calls (also known as function calls) give an LLM access to external tools. The LLM does not call the tools directly. Instead, it suggests the tool to call. The user then calls the tool separately and provides the results back to the LLM. Finally, the LLM formats the response into an answer to the user’s original question.

Request Body Examples

Tool calling with BLACKBOXAI involves three key steps. Here are the essential request body formats for each step:

Step 1: Inference Request with Tools

{
    "model": "blackboxai/google/gemini-2.0-flash-001",
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "What are the titles of some James Joyce books?"
        }
    ],
    "tools": [
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "search_gutenberg_books",
                "description": "Search for books in the Project Gutenberg library",
                "parameters": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "search_terms": {
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": { "type": "string" },
                            "description": "List of search terms to find books"
                        }
                    },
                    "required": ["search_terms"]
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}

Step 2: Tool Execution (Client-Side)

After receiving the model’s response with tool_calls, execute the requested tool locally and prepare the result:

// Model responds with tool_calls, you execute the tool locally
const toolResult = await searchGutenbergBooks(["James", "Joyce"]);

Step 3: Inference Request with Tool Results

{
    "model": "blackboxai/google/gemini-2.0-flash-001",
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "What are the titles of some James Joyce books?"
        },
        {
            "role": "assistant",
            "content": null,
            "tool_calls": [
                {
                    "id": "call_abc123",
                    "type": "function",
                    "function": {
                        "name": "search_gutenberg_books",
                        "arguments": "{"search_terms": ["James", "Joyce"]}"
                    }
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "role": "tool",
            "tool_call_id": "call_abc123",
            "content": "[{"id": 4300, "title": "Ulysses", "authors": [{"name": "Joyce, James"}]}]"
        }
    ],
    "tools": [
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "search_gutenberg_books",
                "description": "Search for books in the Project Gutenberg library",
                "parameters": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "search_terms": {
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": { "type": "string" },
                            "description": "List of search terms to find books"
                        }
                    },
                    "required": ["search_terms"]
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}

Note: The tools parameter must be included in every request (Steps 1 and 3) to validate the tool schema on each call.

Tool Calling Example

Here is typescript code that gives LLMs the ability to call an external API — in this case Project Gutenberg, to search for books. First, let’s do some basic setup:

const API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY";
const API_URL = "https://api.blackbox.ai/chat/completions";

const response = await fetch(API_URL, {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
        Authorization: `Bearer ${API_KEY}`,
        "Content-Type": "application/json",
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        model: "blackboxai/google/gemini-2.0-flash-001",
        messages: [
            { role: "system", content: "You are a helpful assistant." },
            {
                role: "user",
                content: "What are the titles of some James Joyce books?",
            },
        ],
    }),
});

Define the Tool

Next, we define the tool that we want to call. Remember, the tool is going to get requested by the LLM, but the code we are writing here is ultimately responsible for executing the call and returning the results to the LLM.

async function searchGutenbergBooks(searchTerms: string[]): Promise<Book[]> {
    const searchQuery = searchTerms.join(" ");
    const url = "https://gutendex.com/books";
    const response = await fetch(`${url}?search=${searchQuery}`);
    const data = await response.json();

    return data.results.map((book: any) => ({
        id: book.id,
        title: book.title,
        authors: book.authors,
    }));
}

const tools = [
    {
        type: "function",
        function: {
            name: "searchGutenbergBooks",
            description:
                "Search for books in the Project Gutenberg library based on specified search terms",
            parameters: {
                type: "object",
                properties: {
                    search_terms: {
                        type: "array",
                        items: {
                            type: "string",
                        },
                        description:
                            "List of search terms to find books in the Gutenberg library (e.g. ['dickens', 'great'] to search for books by Dickens with 'great' in the title)",
                    },
                },
                required: ["search_terms"],
            },
        },
    },
];

const TOOL_MAPPING = {
    searchGutenbergBooks,
};

Note that the “tool” is just a normal function. We then write a JSON “spec” compatible with the OpenAI function calling parameter. We’ll pass that spec to the LLM so that it knows this tool is available and how to use it. It will request the tool when needed, along with any arguments. We’ll then marshal the tool call locally, make the function call, and return the results to the LLM.

Tool use and tool results

Let’s make the first BLACKBOXAI API call to the model:

const API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY";
const API_URL = "https://api.blackbox.ai/chat/completions";

const request_1 = await fetch(API_URL, {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
        Authorization: `Bearer ${API_KEY}`,
        "Content-Type": "application/json",
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        model: "blackboxai/google/gemini-2.0-flash-001",
        tools,
        messages,
    }),
});

const data = await request_1.json();
const response_1 = data.choices[0].message;

The LLM responds with a finish reason of tool_calls, and a tool_calls array. In a generic LLM response-handler, you would want to check the finish_reason before processing tool calls, but here we will assume it’s the case. Let’s keep going, by processing the tool call:

// Append the response to the messages array so the LLM has the full context
// It's easy to forget this step!
messages.push(response_1);

// Now we process the requested tool calls, and use our book lookup tool
for (const toolCall of response_1.tool_calls) {
    const toolName = toolCall.function.name;
    const { search_params } = JSON.parse(toolCall.function.arguments);
    const toolResponse = await TOOL_MAPPING[toolName](search_params);
    messages.push({
        role: "tool",
        toolCallId: toolCall.id,
        name: toolName,
        content: JSON.stringify(toolResponse),
    });
}

The messages array now has:

Our original request
The LLM’s response (containing a tool call request)
The result of the tool call (a json object returned from the Project Gutenberg API)

Now, we can make a second BLACKBOXAI API call, and hopefully get our result!

const API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY";
const API_URL = "https://api.blackbox.ai/chat/completions";

const response = await fetch(API_URL, {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
        Authorization: `Bearer ${API_KEY}`,
        "Content-Type": "application/json",
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        model: "blackboxai/google/gemini-2.0-flash-001",
        messages,
        tools,
    }),
});

const data = await response.json();
console.log(data.choices[0].message.content);

The output will be something like:

Here are some books by James Joyce:

* Ulysses
* Dubliners
* A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
* Chamber Music
* Exiles: A Play in Three Acts

We did it! We’ve successfully used a tool in a prompt.

Interleaved Thinking

Interleaved thinking allows models to reason between tool calls, enabling more sophisticated decision-making after receiving tool results. This feature helps models chain multiple tool calls with reasoning steps in between and make nuanced decisions based on intermediate results. Important: Interleaved thinking increases token usage and response latency. Consider your budget and performance requirements when enabling this feature.

How Interleaved Thinking Works

With interleaved thinking, the model can:

Reason about the results of a tool call before deciding what to do next
Chain multiple tool calls with reasoning steps in between
Make more nuanced decisions based on intermediate results
Provide transparent reasoning for its tool selection process

Example: Multi-Step Research with Reasoning

Here’s an example showing how a model might use interleaved thinking to research a topic across multiple sources: Initial Request:

{
    "model": "blackboxai/anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "Research the environmental impact of electric vehicles and provide a comprehensive analysis."
        }
    ],
    "tools": [
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "search_academic_papers",
                "description": "Search for academic papers on a given topic",
                "parameters": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "query": { "type": "string" },
                        "field": { "type": "string" }
                    },
                    "required": ["query"]
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "get_latest_statistics",
                "description": "Get latest statistics on a topic",
                "parameters": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "topic": { "type": "string" },
                        "year": { "type": "integer" }
                    },
                    "required": ["topic"]
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}

Model’s Reasoning and Tool Calls:

Initial Thinking: “I need to research electric vehicle environmental impact. Let me start with academic papers to get peer-reviewed research.”
First Tool Call: search_academic_papers({"query": "electric vehicle lifecycle environmental impact", "field": "environmental science"})
After First Tool Result: “The papers show mixed results on manufacturing impact. I need current statistics to complement this academic research.”
Second Tool Call: get_latest_statistics({"topic": "electric vehicle carbon footprint", "year": 2024})
After Second Tool Result: “Now I have both academic research and current data. Let me search for manufacturing-specific studies to address the gaps I found.”
Third Tool Call: search_academic_papers({"query": "electric vehicle battery manufacturing environmental cost", "field": "materials science"})
Final Analysis: Synthesizes all gathered information into a comprehensive response.

Best Practices for Interleaved Thinking

Clear Tool Descriptions: Provide detailed descriptions so the model can reason about when to use each tool
Structured Parameters: Use well-defined parameter schemas to help the model make precise tool calls
Context Preservation: Maintain conversation context across multiple tool interactions
Error Handling: Design tools to provide meaningful error messages that help the model adjust its approach

Implementation Considerations

When implementing interleaved thinking:

Models may take longer to respond due to additional reasoning steps
Token usage will be higher due to the reasoning process
The quality of reasoning depends on the model’s capabilities
Some models may be better suited for this approach than others

A Simple Agentic Loop

In the example above, the calls are made explicitly and sequentially. To handle a wide variety of user inputs and tool calls, you can use an agentic loop. Here’s an example of a simple agentic loop (using the same tools and initial messages as above):

const API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY";
const API_URL = "https://api.blackbox.ai/chat/completions";

async function callLLM(messages: Message[]): Promise<Message> {
    const response = await fetch(
        API_URL,
        {
            method: "POST",
            headers: {
                Authorization: `Bearer ${API_KEY}`,
                "Content-Type": "application/json",
            },
            body: JSON.stringify({
                model: "{{MODEL}}",
                tools,
                messages,
            }),
        }
    );

    const data = await response.json();
    messages.push(data.choices[0].message);
    return data;
}

async function getToolResponse(response: Message): Promise<Message> {
    const toolCall = response.toolCalls[0];
    const toolName = toolCall.function.name;
    const toolArgs = JSON.parse(toolCall.function.arguments);

    // Look up the correct tool locally, and call it with the provided arguments
    // Other tools can be added without changing the agentic loop
    const toolResult = await TOOL_MAPPING[toolName](toolArgs);

    return {
        role: "tool",
        toolCallId: toolCall.id,
        content: toolResult,
    };
}

const maxIterations = 10;
let iterationCount = 0;

while (iterationCount < maxIterations) {
    iterationCount++;
    const response = await callLLM(messages);

    if (response.toolCalls) {
        messages.push(await getToolResponse(response));
    } else {
        break;
    }
}

if (iterationCount >= maxIterations) {
    console.warn("Warning: Maximum iterations reached");
}

console.log(messages[messages.length - 1].content);

Best Practices and Advanced Patterns

Function Definition Guidelines

When defining tools for LLMs, follow these best practices: Clear and Descriptive Names: Use descriptive function names that clearly indicate the tool’s purpose.

// Good: Clear and specific
{ "name": "get_weather_forecast" }

// Avoid: Too vague
{ "name": "weather" }

Comprehensive Descriptions: Provide detailed descriptions that help the model understand when and how to use the tool.

{
    "description": "Get current weather conditions and 5-day forecast for a specific location. Supports cities, zip codes, and coordinates.",
    "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            "location": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "City name, zip code, or coordinates (lat,lng). Examples: 'New York', '10001', '40.7128,-74.0060'"
            },
            "units": {
                "type": "string",
                "enum": ["celsius", "fahrenheit"],
                "description": "Temperature unit preference",
                "default": "celsius"
            }
        },
        "required": ["location"]
    }
}

Streaming with Tool Calls

When using streaming responses with tool calls, handle the different content types appropriately:

const API_KEY = "YOUR_API_KEY";
const API_URL = "https://api.blackbox.ai/chat/completions";

const stream = await fetch(API_URL, {
    method: "POST",
    headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        model: "blackboxai/anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
        messages: messages,
        tools: tools,
        stream: true,
    }),
});

const reader = stream.body.getReader();
let toolCalls = [];

while (true) {
    const { done, value } = await reader.read();
    if (done) {
        break;
    }

    const chunk = new TextDecoder().decode(value);
    const lines = chunk.split("\n").filter((line) => line.trim());

    for (const line of lines) {
        if (line.startsWith("data: ")) {
            const data = JSON.parse(line.slice(6));

            if (data.choices[0].delta.tool_calls) {
                toolCalls.push(...data.choices[0].delta.tool_calls);
            }

            if (data.choices[0].delta.finish_reason === "tool_calls") {
                await handleToolCalls(toolCalls);
            } else if (data.choices[0].delta.finish_reason === "stop") {
                // Regular completion without tool calls
                break;
            }
        }
    }
}

Tool Choice Configuration

Control tool usage with the tool_choice parameter:

// Let model decide (default)
{ "tool_choice": "auto" }

// Disable tool usage
{ "tool_choice": "none" }

// Force specific tool
{
    "tool_choice": {
        "type": "function",
        "function": { "name": "search_database" }
    }
}

Parallel Tool Calls

Control whether multiple tools can be called simultaneously with the parallel_tool_calls parameter (default is true for most models):

// Disable parallel tool calls - tools will be called sequentially
{ "parallel_tool_calls": false }

When parallel_tool_calls is false, the model will only request one tool call at a time instead of potentially multiple calls in parallel.

Multi-Tool Workflows

Design tools that work well together:

{
    "tools": [
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "search_products",
                "description": "Search for products in the catalog"
            }
        },
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "get_product_details",
                "description": "Get detailed information about a specific product"
            }
        },
        {
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
                "name": "check_inventory",
                "description": "Check current inventory levels for a product"
            }
        }
    ]
}

This allows the model to naturally chain operations: search → get details → check inventory.

API documentation

Models

​Request Body Examples

​Step 1: Inference Request with Tools

​Step 2: Tool Execution (Client-Side)

​Step 3: Inference Request with Tool Results

​Tool Calling Example

​Define the Tool

​Tool use and tool results

​Interleaved Thinking

​How Interleaved Thinking Works

​Example: Multi-Step Research with Reasoning

​Best Practices for Interleaved Thinking

​Implementation Considerations

​A Simple Agentic Loop

​Best Practices and Advanced Patterns

​Function Definition Guidelines

​Streaming with Tool Calls

​Tool Choice Configuration

​Parallel Tool Calls

​Multi-Tool Workflows